Re: glibc 2.1.2

[Graham Murray]

Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> necessary.  The most important one is the compiler.  Although other
> versions might work it is recommended to get gcc 2.96.  But see the
> FAQ for expected failures.  In case of a problem during the
> compilation with a compiler other than gcc 2.96 get the recommended
> version first (at http://sourceware.cygnus.com).  

Do you really mean 2.96? I already have 2.95-1 and I have seen no
announcements of 2.96, nor can I see 2.96 at sourceware.