On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 02:14:56PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 01:06:33PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > Dynamically allocated struct device are not the problem as then you're
> > > not *reusing* the same device structure.

> > You may end up doing exactly that depending on what you get back from
> > the allocator of course.

> But then the memory has already been released. You're not deregistering
> and reregistering the same device as in your example.

Depends on your definition of "same" :)  You might get the same address
back which has been known to confuse unhelpfully designed things.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to