On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Moritz Fischer <moritz.fisc...@ettus.com> wrote:
> The USRP E3XX series requires pinctrl to configure the idle state > FPGA image for minimizing power consumption. > This is required since different daughtercards have different uses > for pins on a common connector. > > Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fisc...@ettus.com> (...) > +static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc e3xx_pins[] = { > + /* pin0 doesn't exist */ > + PINCTRL_PIN(1, "DB_1"), > + PINCTRL_PIN(2, "DB_2"), (...) > + PINCTRL_PIN(119, "DB_119"), > + PINCTRL_PIN(120, "DB_120"), > +}; These should be the names on the data sheet for the balls/pins on the ASIC. Is this the case? I saw some discussion with Arnd that indicated it was rather rail names for a certain board and that is not OK. > +static int e3xx_pinctrl_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const char *e3xx_pinctrl_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > + unsigned selector) > +{ > + return NULL; > +} > + > +static int e3xx_pinctrl_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > + unsigned selector, > + const unsigned **pins, > + unsigned *num_pins) > +{ > + return -ENOTSUPP; > +} Hm maybe we should make these group callbacks optional in the pinctrl core? > +static int e3xx_pinconf_cfg_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > + unsigned pin, > + unsigned long *configs, > + unsigned num_configs) > +{ > + u32 reg, mask; > + int i; > + struct e3xx_pinctrl *pctrl; > + unsigned int param, arg; > + > + if (pin >= E3XX_NUM_DB_PINS) > + return -ENOTSUPP; > + mask = BIT(pin % E3XX_PINS_PER_REG); > + > + pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); > + > + clk_enable(pctrl->clk); Have you considered using pm_runtime_get_sync() etc with callbacks instead of hammering clk_enable/disable all the time? See drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c for an example of how to do it in the runtime PM ops callbacks. It requires some tweaks (look closely at all setup there) but it pays off. > +static int e3xx_pinconf_group_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > + unsigned selector, > + unsigned long *configs, > + unsigned num_configs) > +{ > + return -EAGAIN; > +} Maybe you should group this with the other group callbacks. Apart from these remarks it looks pretty nice. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html