Hi Geert, Laurent

> > #define _PORT_GP_CFG_2(bank, pin, fn, sfx, cfg) \
> > -        _PORT_GP_CFG_1(bank, 0, fn, sfx, cfg) _PORT_GP_CFG_1(bank, 1, fn, 
> > sfx, cfg)
> > +        _PORT_GP_CFG_1(bank, pin, fn, sfx, cfg) _PORT_GP_CFG_1(bank, pin + 
> > 1, fn, sfx, cfg)
(snip)
> > I noticed it seems difficult, because it is based on
> >
> >         #define PORT_GP_CFG_1(bank, pin, fn, sfx, cfg) fn(bank, pin, 
> > GP_##bank##_##pin, sfx, cfg)
> >                                     ~~~                                     
> >        ~~~
> > we can't use (pin + x) style.
> > It seems we need all 0 - 32 definition anyway...
> 
> Oh right. CPP cannot evaluate the pin number arithmetic :-(
> 
> Then your previous patch is indeed the best we can do, I'm afraid.

I think your idea was good, but unfortunately we can't use it.
Laurent, what do you think about this patch ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to