On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Monday 30 November 2015 09:47:03 Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
>>
>> > resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration,
>> > so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly
>> > warns:
>> >
>> > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe':
>> > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:1003:41: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type
>> > 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'resource_size_t {aka long long
>> > unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
>> > dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: hwirq=%u\n", i, res->start);
>> >
>> > This changes the format string to use the special "%pr" format
>> > string that prints a resource, and changes the arguments so we
>> > the resource structure directly.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
>> > ---
>> > v2: don't break ordering of arguments, that part was correct already,
>> > unlike
>> > what I said in v1.
>>
>> Patch applied with Ludovic's review tag.
>
> I don't see this in linux-next, did the commit get lost accidentally?
No, it's just that I screwed up the next branch so many times and
Stephen has not been able to pull it into linux-next.
Hope it works now...
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
