> I think that the father of this bash script (lrm?) is setting the > action of SIGPIPE to SIG_IGN, and then "cat" itself notice that and > resets it to a function printing that on stderr.
Re-thinking to that: cat should *not* trap SIGPIPE, but only checking the return code of every write (like it should). -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tel: (33) 04 92 38 79 11, Bur: C112 INRIA Sophia, 2004, rte des Lucioles, B.P.93 - 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
