Hi,

Am Montag, 24. April 2006 17:25 schrieb Lars Marowsky-Bree:
> On 2006-04-24T17:21:23, "Joachim Banzhaf (compuserve)" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >   <nvpair id="cib-bootstrap-options-default_resource_stickiness" ...
>
> Well, in this case it's at least completely irrelevant. The "id"
> doesn't matter here, it matters in the enclosing block.

Probably not now.

I just deleted the depreciated value which I found in my cib with crm_verify:

crm_verify[29911]: 2006/04/24_14:11:04 ERROR: mask(unpack.c:unpack_config): 
Creating <nvpair id=default_resource_stickiness 
name=default_resource_stickiness/> directlybeneath <crm_config> has been 
depreciated since 2.0.1 and is now disabled

with

cibadmin --cib_delete -X '<nvpair id="default_resource_stickiness"/>'

N.B.: which I first entered as cibadmin --cib-delete ...

So, next time the crm config gets rearranged, it will matter for me when 
entering the current id :-)

> > Or, do it like the linux module loader with module names: allow both?
>
> We should standarize on one and allow both for the old ones.

Sounds good to me.

> > Right now it is quite annoying to remember the exact syntax with no
> > apparent meaning behind it...
>
> We're trying to keep you on your toes. ;-)

You surely succeed in that!

> Sincerely,
>     Lars Marowsky-Brée

Regards,

Joachim Banzhaf
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to