Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-05-26T14:36:42, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The cluster name is actually something which EVMS has also asked for.
They are faking it for now...
So, this _is_ somewhat related to stretch clustering, but EVMS also has
asked for it forever...
http://www.osdl.org/developer_bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1089
I've reassigned this bug to HZ, and CCed you on it.
Ah, I see the point.
Now, with the consequences this may have on EVMS2 too, I really think we
ought to push a 2.0.6 w/o this before, as to have a stable base for our
current users.
Only if they recode their application to use it. The nice thing is the
way he made it visible, their code should be able to work on older and
newer versions of 2.0 with very little change.
--
Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
