On 12/3/06, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
um, you know this commit has no effect right?
what was the reasoning behind it?

author          Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Wed Nov 29 13:21:02 2006 -0700 (3 days ago)
changeset       548784254964
Put in changes to add explicit timeouts for all the operations in CTS.
Initialized to 20 seconds to start with...


ok, so now i see this:

Increased timeouts for operations and added XML for the operations so they
author  Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mon Dec 04 10:50:24 2006 -0700 (2 days ago)
changeset       1ce76f4bf65f
manifest        31a6d6a526ea
parent  f32c5def6eeb
parent  9dd696c36747
child   efa0bfbe81a6
Increased timeouts for operations and added XML for the operations so they
can be individually specified.

Alan, can you please explain what you're doing? Because apart from
anything else the comments dont match the commit.

--
Andrew Beekhof

"Would the last person to leave please turn out the enlightenment?" -
TISM

_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to