Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2007-10-25T16:25:30, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/rev/69f0395c2ead seems to fix some of this
for me.
BTW, I was able to conclude a 100 cycle run with that patch applied on 7
nodes, and absolutely not a single BadNews, which is a first.
Cutting out that debug should be OK - or raising it to happen if debug
is > 1 would probably also be OK. If you're seeing this happen a lot,
that's not a good thing. Getting behind 200 messages seems like a lot
to me - off hand.
Are you also seeing retransmissions?
Just because you have a lot of processors doesn't mean that Xen is
scheduling you properly. You have two different schedulers going on
here - so the opportunities for problems go up rather rapidly.
--
Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/