On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:32:32AM +0900, HIDEO YAMAUCHI wrote: > Hi, > > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:34:00PM +0900, HIDEO YAMAUCHI wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 03:53:56PM +0900, HIDEO YAMAUCHI wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > There are the following problems to a resource script of current > > > > > apache. > > > > > (http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org//show_bug.cgi?id=1800) > > > > > > > > > > 1.A parent process of apache falls. > > > > > > > > You mean fails ... > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.In the stop script, child process is not stopped. > > > > > > > > ... and the children are left hanging around. > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > 3.Though the process of the parent falls, the child process > > > > > replies and continues handling it. > > > > > > > > I see your point, it's just strange that nobody ever complained > > > > about this. Under which circumstances does this happen? > > > > > > When only an owner process failed, it is generated. > > > can confirm it when downed by a Kill command artificially. > > > > > > ex. kill -9 ApachePID > > > > I see. But does that ever happen in normal operation? > > > > Also, isn't it that the children never listen for requests, but > > they may be handling existing requests or waiting for the parent > > process to pass one? > > > > In the former case, perhaps it's a good idea to let them finish: > > given the nature of http they will be short-lived and the user > > experience is going to be better. I think that these should not > > be killed and they are going to leave anyway, probably within a > > subsecond period. > > > > As for the latter, those are the preforked processes for faster > > start. I'm not sure what happens to them, but the important > > question is if they would prevent the new apache instance from > > starting. I guess not. At the worst case, they may just remain > > and be swapped out until some merciful soul removes them. > > > > Can somebody who's experience apache administrator help here? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dejan > > Probably I think that do not get up by the normal operation. > > But, it is a problem to fail in the reboot of the resource in the same node > by this child process. > The failure of the reboot of this resource continues till child process stops. > > It is the problem that may be hard to happen, but thinks that I am effective.
OK. I'll evaluate the patch and apply it. Cheers, Dejan > Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I made a patch to stop all processes. > > > > > Evaluate this patch, and please include it. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the patch! > > > > > > > > Dejan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > _______________________________________________________ > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
