Did it work for you? Shall we ask Dejan to commit this patch?

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Yoshihiko SATO
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Serge,
>
> Thank you so much for your quick action!
> I'll test the patch.
>
>
> Regards,
> Yoshihiko SATO.
>
>> Attached is a patch that checks that DomU disappears from the "xm
>> list" on Dom0 after running destroy.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Serge Dubrouski <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello -
>>>
>>> This makes sense and I''ll think how to implement that. Thank for the
>>> suggestion.
>>>
>>> 2009/4/13 Yoshihiko SATO <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Serge,
>>>>
>>>> I consider about the case that two or more plugins are set in cib.xml.
>>>> For example, xen0(STONITH plugin for DomU) and ibmrsa-telnet(the one for
>>>> Dom0) or something.
>>>> The setting's purpose is to STONITH Dom0 when xen0 failed to STONITH
>>>> DomU.
>>>> Then, I found the following problem about xen0's fence(off|reset)
>>>> action.
>>>>
>>>> xen0 doesn't check the return code of xm destroy.
>>>> Instead, it check the target DomU is dead or alive with ping command in
>>>> CheckIfDead(), right?
>>>> However, ping does not receive any reply packets at all
>>>> not only when DomU is normally STONITH'ed but when kernel panic or
>>>> kernel hang occurs on Dom0.
>>>> In the case that failure occurs on Dom0, xen0 judges "the fence action
>>>> succeeded", by mistake.
>>>> Then, STONITH plugin which is able to STONITH Dom0 (like ibmrsa-telnet
>>>> etc.) is not executed.
>>>> So, I consider that it should confirm whether xm destroy via ssh
>>>> succeeded or not.
>>>> And it is better to check whether the target is dead with ping only when
>>>> the command succeeded.
>>>> If xm destroy is failed, xen0 should return "fence action is failed", I
>>>> think.
>>>> What do you think about this?
>>>> I would like to hear any opinion.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Yoshihiko SATO
>>>> _______________________________________________________
>>>> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>>>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Serge Dubrouski.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________________
>> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>



-- 
Serge Dubrouski.
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to