Hi Dejan,
> If you drop 2>&1 this won't be silent status any more :)
>
> So, I would like to understand what are your circumstances, i.e.
> why does this bother you so much that you want it included "by
> all means".
I forgot an original purpose.
The revision of ProcessRunning withdraws it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- a/heartbeat/apache Thu Nov 12 13:26:59 2009 +0900
+++ b/heartbeat/apache Mon Nov 16 10:18:46 2009 +0900
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@
[ $tries -lt 10 ]
do
sleep 1
- kill $ApachePID >/dev/null 2>&1
+ kill $ApachePID >/dev/null
ocf_log info "Killing apache PID $ApachePID"
tries=`expr $tries + 1`
done
@@ -362,8 +362,8 @@
fi
for sig in SIGTERM SIGHUP SIGKILL ; do
- if pgrep -f $HTTPD.*$CONFIGFILE >/dev/null 2>&1 ; then
- pkill -$sig -f $HTTPD.*$CONFIGFILE >/dev/null 2>&1
+ if pgrep -f $HTTPD.*$CONFIGFILE >/dev/null ; then
+ pkill -$sig -f $HTTPD.*$CONFIGFILE >/dev/null
ocf_log info "apache children were signalled ($sig)"
sleep 1
else
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Hideo-san,
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:42:21PM +0900, [email protected] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We review the output of the error log of RA.
> >
> > In RA of apace, the error of the kill command is canceled somehow or other.
>
> Right. That is common practice, since there's typically not
> anything interesting in the output of the kill command (either
> process doesn't exist or permission denied).
>
> > I made a patch to output it without canceling the failure of the kill
> > command.
> >
> > It is a small patch, but wants you to include it in the latest
> > edition by all means.
>
> Let me quote part of the code:
>
> silent_status() {
> if
> [ -f $PidFile ]
> then
> ProcessRunning `cat $PidFile`
> ...
>
> ProcessRunning() {
> ...
> # This assumes we're running as root...
> kill -0 "$ApachePID" >/dev/null 2>&1
>
> If you drop 2>&1 this won't be silent status any more :)
>
> So, I would like to understand what are your circumstances, i.e.
> why does this bother you so much that you want it included "by
> all means".
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dejan
>
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Hideo Yamauchi.
>
>
> > _______________________________________________________
> > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
