Hi, On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 12:07:59PM -0500, Sam Tran wrote: > Hi All, > > I followed the thread "Food for thought: add something like cutter to > IPaddr2 (or portblock?) RA" > (http://lists.linux-ha.org/pipermail/linux-ha-dev/2008-October/016196.html) > with great interest. > > I am working on a cluster of Master OpenLDAP servers using PaceMaker > and OpenAIS. The problem I have lies in the replication between the > master server that holds the IP address resource and a replica server. > In the "refreshAndPersist" replication mode that is being used, the > replica polls the master server for updates, then the connection > between the replica and the master server is maintained, and the > replica is waiting for subsequent updates from the master server. In > the event of a failure of the initial master the new master is taking > over the IP address resource, but doesn't know anything about the > previous persist stage, therefore is not able to send new updates to > the replica. An RST needs to be sent to the replica in order to > terminate the existing session and force a polling retry from the > replica, or the replica would wait for the session to time out. > > I was wondering whether some work has been done as far as the > implentation of the tickle ACK feature in IPaddr2 RA is concerned.
Not to my knowledge. It would obviously be a good feature. The only thing which is not clear to me is who/how would keep/maintain/synchronize the connections database Thanks, Dejan > Thanks. > > -- > Sam > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
