Hi, On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:28:11PM +0100, Ante Karamatić wrote: > On 01.03.2010 12:55, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > > Why would you want to do this? Not implying that it's wrong, that > > could be a matter of preference, just interested in your > > motivation. BTW, the upstream rpm creates three packages: > > cluster-glue, libglue, libglue-dev. > > During the procedure of moving cluster-glue to main component of Ubuntu, > there was a requirement of splitting those libraries into different > packages. I guess this could happen in Debian too. > > From the perspective that, in the future, there might be other programs > that would like to, for example, utilize stonith functions but not lrm, > having those libraries separated would be great.
Why was there a requirement? Making single packages for every single library seems like nonsense to me. stonith/lrm/clplumbing exist for years and I've never heard of anybody using just one or the other piece. What would probably make sense is packaging stonith agents in a separate package. > There are no strong reasons for this, it just seemed right thing to do. > If upstream thinks this is not ok or false, I'd be ok with dropping this > change. So, unless you come up with more convincing arguments, yes, this upstream is against. I'd be happy to hear other opinions, of course. Thanks, Dejan > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
