On 2010-03-29T11:51:10, Tim Serong <tser...@novell.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This fixes a flawed assumption the SAPInstance RA makes about how
> it should monitor master/slave clones. It was relying on the op
> target RC, but this is completely wrong, and in any case, as of
> http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/299cb10f85bc,
> RAs don't even have access to this value.
The SAP folks maintain their RA outside our project too. I'd recommend
to not diverge, since it'll make further merging effort annoying.
Can we get them to update their copy and sent us incremental patches? Or
maybe get them to maintain it in our tree "officially". (Or, if they are
so inclined, drop it from ours and have it as a separate package with
provider="sap")
Hm. I'll start a disucssion with them tomorrow if you don't beat me to
it with your timezone advantage ;-)
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
