Sorry, pressed send too quickly... On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenb...@linbit.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 07:58:38PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> I vote for reapplying the patch, bumping the SO name and forgetting >> about the whole thing. > > The only thing I do is move the two new members to the end of the struct, > keeping backwards compatibility, before bumping the SO name anyways, > though not from 2.0.0 to 3.0.0, but only to 2.1.0. > > Because I don't see why we would insist on breaking backwards > compatibility, if keeping it is that cheap.
I'll admit to not following the conversation that closely, but the revised patch you posted didn't look all that cheap to me. Or is that a different conversation? _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
