On 11/18/2010 02:47 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Its not that I'm against your proposal, I just don't know of enough
> resources to build, test and stabilize a new communication protocol.
> In that context, an off-the-shelf component that gives us a couple of
> magnitudes worth of additional scaling looks pretty attractive - and
> should provide some valuable feedback for how to take it to the next
> level.
Right. I don't think this is as complex as for example the original
heartbeat protocol (with error recovery and so on). Time will tell -
assuming I have enough time to do anything with it at all ;-).
But, I won't be dealing with the overhead my company imposes on official
efforts - which will at least triple my effectiveness ;-).
--
Alan Robertson<al...@unix.sh>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me claim
from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William Wilberforce
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
