On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 15:38 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:27:18PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:32:54AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:56:27PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > > >> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic 
> > > >> <deja...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > > >> > Hello,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > There is a new repository for Resource Agents which contains RA
> > > >> > sets from both Linux HA and Red Hat projects:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >        git://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents.git
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The purpose of the common repository is to share maintenance load
> > > >> > and try to consolidate resource agents.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > There were no conflicts with the rgmanager RA set and both source
> > > >> > layouts remain the same. It is only that autoconf bits were
> > > >> > merged. The only difference is that if you want to get Linux HA
> > > >> > set of resource agents installed, configure should be run like
> > > >> > this:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >        configure --with-ras-set=linux-ha ...
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The new repository is git but the existing history is preserved.
> > > >> > People used to Mercurial shouldn't have hard time working with
> > > >> > git.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > We need to retire the existing repository hg.linux-ha.org. Are
> > > >> > there any objections or concerns that still need to be addressed?
> > > >>
> > > >> Might not hurt to leave it around - there might be various URLs that
> > > >> point there.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, it will definitely remain there. What I meant with retire,
> > > > is that the developers then start using the git repository
> > > > exclusively.
> > > 
> > > AHHHH
> > > 
> > > Yes, and making read-only on the server it probably a good idea (to
> > > avoid pushes).
> > 
> > I just committed:
> > 
> > http://hg.linux-ha.org/agents/rev/7a11934b142d
> > 
> > and then added a hook:
> > 
> > # hg push -r default ssh://h...@hg.linux-ha.org/agents
> > pushing to ssh://h...@hg.linux-ha.org/agents
> > searching for changes
> > remote:
> > remote: Repository moved! Please use
> > remote:         https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents
> > remote:         git://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents.git
> > remote:
> > remote: abort: prechangegroup.superseeded hook exited with status 1
> > abort: unexpected response: empty string
> > 
> > is that ok with everyone?
> 
> Sure. Thanks Lars.
> 
> Dejan
> 
Hi,
I'm sure you are aware that commits in the old repository after 1.0.4
are not brought forward to the new one ?

BTW I corrected the references to repository in the Wiki pages.

- holger
> > -- 
> > : Lars Ellenberg
> > : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
> > : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com
> > 
> > DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.
> > _______________________________________________________
> > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/


_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to