On 2011-03-14T19:49:29, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote:
> I suspect you want b) with maybe 6 people for redundancy.
> The pull request workflow should be well suited to a project like this
> and impose minimal overhead.
I prefer b as well, since it adds another review step. (Should we use
the github.com code review tools?)
Oh, and we can use the ha-wg-technical mailing list for cross-project
coordination ;-)
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
