On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:30:04AM -0300, [email protected] wrote: > > > Thanks for the help. More interesting than the drbd does not generate a log > even with it all normal. The network cards are connected with a Gigabit > broadcom cross cable. These logs are generated once in a while. Will attempt > to set the parameters in sysctl.conf below concerning the network, what do > you think?net.core.rmem_max = 16777216 net.core.wmem_max = 16777216 > net.core.rmem_default = 16777216 net.core.wmem_default = 16777216> Hi,> > On > Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:44:04PM -0300, [email protected] > wrote:>>>>>> Hello, I am using drbd (two primary) + heartbeat
I really cannot say. Depends on your applications. And best to ask in another forum concerned with server/network tuning. Thanks, Dejan > (auto_failback on). In this Server1>> has more hosts connected to this by > presenting the following log: Version 3.0.3-2>> heartbeat. I changed the > values ​​in / etc / ha.d / ha.cfg as below, but>> the > problem continues keepalive 4 deadtime 20 warntime 15 inga root @: ~ # tail-f > />> var / log / ha-log Apr 27 07:37:55 inga heartbeat: [8495]: WARN:>> > Gmain_timeout_dispatch: Dispatch function for send local status took too long > to>> execute: 100 ms (> 50 ms) (GSource: 0x74e350) Apr 27 13:11:43 inga > heartbeat: [8495]:>> WARN: Gmain_timeout_dispatch: Dispatch function for > send local status took too long to>> execute: 60 ms (> 50 ms) (GSource: > 0x74e350) Apr 27 13:12:02 inga heartbeat: [8495]:>> WARN: G_CH_dispatch_int: > Dispatch function for read child took too long to execute: 70>> ms (> 50 > ms) (GSource: 0x74bac0) Apr 27 13:12:03 inga heartbeat: [8495]: WARN:>> > G_CH_dispatch_int: Dispatch function for read child took too long to execute: > 60 m> s>> (> 50 ms) (GSource: 0x74bac0) This log worries me A few more > days he appeared and the>> server eventually declared dead. Thanks> > > This should indicate that this node has a high load and couldn't> > keep up with the demand.> > BTW, this kind of question belongs to the > user mailing list.> > Thanks,> >Dejan> > P.S. Looks like you are really short > on newlines over there.> > >> _______________________________________________________>> > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]>> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev>> Home Page: > http://linux-ha.org/> > > _______________________________________________________> Linux-HA-Dev: > [email protected]> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev> Home Page: > http://linux-ha.org/> > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
