Lars/Team I agree.
I can understand that there are some parameters that are MANDATORY and UNPREDICTABLE, but there are just as likely to be parameters that are MANDATORY and have a REASONABLE DEFAULT VALUE. As an example, the IP address is Mandatory and Unpredictable, but the path too and name of a configuration file (although still Mandatory) could have a Reasonable Default Value (although there may still be merit in allowing it to be overridden to provide localisations etc). I think it's too extreme to force all mandatory value to not be given default values, as (for example this particular case), there are a few mandatory values that do have reasonable defaults that could be used, in most cases. Darren On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 12:00 -0600, linux-ha-dev-requ...@lists.linux-ha.org wrote: > Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 20:49:41 +0200 > From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <l...@novell.com> > Subject: Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [Openais] An OCF agent for LXC (Linux > Containers) > To: High-Availability Linux Development List > <linux-ha-dev@lists.linux-ha.org> > Message-ID: <20110501184941.gr17...@suse.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > On 2011-04-26T16:03:48, Dejan Muhamedagic <de...@suse.de> wrote: > > > - the "required" attributes in meta-data need to be reviewed, > > a parameter is either required or has a default, cannot be > > both > > Why would this be the case? > > > Regards, > Lars >
_______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
