On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 05:08:18PM +0800, Qiu Zhigang wrote: > Hi, > > > > I want to mount CIFS storage on every node of pacemaker cluster, so I use > clone like following: > > > > <clone id="cifs-clone"> > > <meta_attributes id="cifs-clone-meta_attributes"> > > <nvpair id="cifs-clone-meta_attributes-target-role" > name="target-role" value="Started"/> > > </meta_attributes> > > <primitive class="ocf" id="Mount_cifs" provider="heartbeat" > type="Filesystem"> > > <instance_attributes id="Mount_cifs-instance_attributes"> > > <nvpair id="Mount_cifs-instance_attributes-device" name="device" > value="//192.168.1.40/xxxx"/> > > <nvpair id="Mount_cifs-instance_attributes-directory" > name="directory" value="/mnt/cifs"/> > > <nvpair id="Mount_cifs-instance_attributes-fstype" name="fstype" > value="cifs"/> > > <nvpair id="Mount_cifs-instance_attributes-options" name="options" > value="username=admin,password=xxxx,rw"/> > > </instance_attributes> > > </primitive> > > </clone> > > > > However when I start cifs-clone, some error occurred, start failed, > following is the log. > > > > Dec 21 18:50:24 h10_150 Filesystem[2935]: INFO: Running start for > 192.168.1.40:/mnt/test/nfs/xxxx on /mnt/nfs Dec 21 18:50:24 h10_150 > Filesystem[2935]: ERROR: DANGER! cifs on 192.168.1.40:/mnt/test/nfs/xxxx is > NOT cluster-aware! > > Dec 21 18:50:24 h10_150 Filesystem[2935]: ERROR: DO NOT RUN IT AS A CLONE! > > Dec 21 18:50:24 h10_150 Filesystem[2935]: ERROR: Politely refusing to > proceed to avoid data corruption. > > Dec 21 18:50:24 h10_150 crmd: [2083]: info: process_lrm_event: LRM operation > > Mount_cifs:0_start_0 (call=13, rc=6, cib-update=103, confirmed=true) not > configured > > > > So I read the Filesystem script code, find following code before start > resource. > > > > case $FSTYPE in > > ocfs2) ocfs2_init > > ;; > > nfs|smbfs|none|gfs2) : # this is kind of safe too
right. so just add cifs in there, ok? and send a patch ... current upstream is here: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/blob/master/heartbeat/Filesystem > > ;; > > *) if [ -n "$OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_clone" ]; then > > ocf_log err "$OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_clone" > > ocf_log err "DANGER! $FSTYPE on $DEVICE is NOT > cluster-aware!" > > ocf_log err "DO NOT RUN IT AS A CLONE!" > > ocf_log err "Politely refusing to proceed to avoid data > corruption." > > exit $OCF_ERR_CONFIGURED > > fi > > ;; > > Esac > > > > I want to know why CIFS isn't the kind of safe FSTYPE, but smbfs is > considered safe ? They are not the same as it ? > > > > PS: > > > > I could start CIFS resource directly instead of clone. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > Qiu Zhigang > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ -- : Lars Ellenberg : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
