Hi Dejan, Thank you for comments.
> > > > > Now the ocft test fails: > > > > > > > > > > 2012/01/23_21:39:40 ERROR: IP address [127.0.0.3] is a loopback > > > > > address, thus can not be preferred source address > > > > > > > > > > Any idea how to update the ocft test case? > > > > > > > > I try this problem, too. > > > > > > I carried out ocf-tester with three cases. > > > > > > Case1) I carry it out after improving an address by ifconfig command. > > > > > > [root@rh57-3 ClusterLabs-resource-agents-7edbe1d]# ifconfig eth0:1 > > > 192.168.40.7 up > > > [root@rh57-3 ClusterLabs-resource-agents-7edbe1d]# ocf-tester -v -n > > > IPsrcaddr -o ipaddress=192.168.40.7 > > > /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/IPsrcaddr > > > Beginning tests for /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/IPsrcaddr... > > > Testing permissions with uid nobody > > > Testing: meta-data > > [...] [Note to myself: drop the meta-data output] > > > ERROR: Setup problem: couldn't find command: gawk > > > > Install gawk perhaps? I am mysterious...gwak had been already installed, but this error seemed to be given. The next environment variable(OCF_TESTER_FAIL_HAVE_BINARY) of ocf-tester seems to influence it somehow or other. (snip) OCF_TESTER_FAIL_HAVE_BINARY=1 export OCF_TESTER_FAIL_HAVE_BINARY OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_interval=0 test_command monitor (snip) Similar error occurs in IPaddr2. [root@rh57-3 heartbeat]# ocf-tester -v -n IPaddr2 -o ip=192.168.40.8 /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/IPaddr2 Beginning tests for /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/IPaddr2... Testing permissions with uid nobody (snip) Checking current state Testing: monitor Testing: monitor ERROR: Setup problem: couldn't find command: ip Testing: start (snip) Is not a correction of ocf-tester necessary? > > > > [...] > > > INFO: The ip route has been already set.(192.168.40.0/24, eth0, default > > > via 192.168.40.1 dev eth0 ) > > > > Hmm, I saw different stuff: > > > > ERROR: command 'ip route replace 10.2.13.0/24 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 src > > 10.2.13.154' failed > > > > Debugging: > > > > + ip route replace 10.2.13.0/24 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 src 10.2.13.154 > > Error: either "to" is duplicate, or "169.254.0.0/16" is a garbage. > > > > The route list: > > > > xen-d:~ # ip route list > > default via 10.2.13.1 dev eth0 > > 10.2.13.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.2.13.54 > > 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link > > 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link > > > > It seems like the last entry confuses the new calculation code. In my environment, I set it in NOZEROCONF=yes. Therefore, the last entry does not exist. > > It turns out that the problem is here (nothing to do with your > patch): > > NETWORK=`ip route list dev $INTERFACE scope link|grep -o '^[^ ]*'` > > Perhaps we should do: > > NETWORK=`ip route list dev $INTERFACE match $ipaddress scope link|grep -o > '^[^ ]*'` > > Opinions? I think that the method that you showed is more right. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
