On 03/20/2012 03:40 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2012-03-19T16:29:23, "Soffen, Matthew"<msof...@iso-ne.com> wrote: > >> I believe that the reason for not using #bash is that it is it NOT part of >> the default install on non Linux systems. > That is what package dependencies are for. Matt's point is simple: Avoiding dependencies is far better than declaring them.
There is nothing in bash which cannot be easily done in the standard POSIX shell. We have avoided these things in most of our RAs - and there is no reason to change that. -- Alan Robertson<al...@unix.sh> - @OSSAlanR "Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William Wilberforce _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/