On 03/20/2012 03:40 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2012-03-19T16:29:23, "Soffen, Matthew"<msof...@iso-ne.com> wrote:
>
>> I believe that the reason for not using #bash is that it is it NOT part of
>> the default install on non Linux systems.
> That is what package dependencies are for.
Matt's point is simple: Avoiding dependencies is far better than
declaring them.
There is nothing in bash which cannot be easily done in the standard
POSIX shell.
We have avoided these things in most of our RAs - and there is no reason
to change that.
--
Alan Robertson<al...@unix.sh> - @OSSAlanR
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me claim
from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William Wilberforce
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
