On 2012-04-04T01:52:12, Christian Franke <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Florian,
>
> Your question is fully justified - I sincerely apologize for ignoring
> that comprehensive documentation.
>
> I rewrote the patch trying to adhere to the requirements given in the
> documentation.
Hi Christian,
that patch shares a *lot* of code with IPaddr(2), doesn't it?
I wonder if that wouldn't benefit from refactoring, moving shared
functions to an include?
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
