Hi, On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:34:59PM +0200, Florian Haas wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I had to repeatedly deal with customer/partner scenarios where the SAN > > was unreliable, and outages were correlated across fabrics. The desire > > was to avoid the self-fence in such cases if the cluster is quorate and > > the node is not unhealthy. > > > > This required SBD to link against pacemaker's CIB and PE libraries, and > > all that that implies. Which meant sbd had to move out of cluster-glue, > > or else we'd face a build loop. > > > > To give you a glance of the extended sbd code, you can check out > > http://hg.linux-ha.org/sbd - the new Pacemaker integration is activated > > using the "-P" option in /etc/sysconfig/sbd, otherwise sbd remains a > > drop-in replacement for the previous versions. > > Just as a suggestion: since you're already taking this out of glue, > would you mind also moving the repo to GitHub? It's just orders of > magnitude more straightforward to review and comment on code that way.
This is OT and I appologize for the noise, but I need to chime in here: it is really a matter of preference whether code review is more comfortable in the mouse oriented github than by other means (i.e. in an editor). Cheers, Dejan > Cheers, > Florian > > -- > Need help with High Availability? > http://www.hastexo.com/now > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
