On 22 June 2012 17:20, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenb...@linbit.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:29:43PM +0700, Philippe Alcoy wrote: > > # HG changeset patch > > # User Philippe Alcoy <phili...@alcoy.co.uk> > > # Date 1340188944 -25200 > > # Node ID f6ce2daddba6234643f715c46b28d5562940eb1f > > # Parent add12b838ef461b20eec223e551bf508038dc640 > > Fix ha.cf node parsing in ha_propagate > > Someone is actually *using* this? > and even with multiple nodes per "node" line in ha.cf?
Probably not. I was just curious and tested it in the lab. > > diff -r add12b838ef4 -r f6ce2daddba6 heartbeat/lib/ha_propagate.in > > --- a/heartbeat/lib/ha_propagate.in Mon Apr 09 17:50:27 2012 +0200 > > +++ b/heartbeat/lib/ha_propagate.in Wed Jun 20 17:42:24 2012 +0700 > > @@ -27,9 +27,8 @@ > > for line in f: > > if line.startswith("node"): > > toks = line.split() > > - if (len(toks) == 2): > > - nodeName = toks[1] > > - nodes.append(nodeName) > > + if (len(toks) > 0): > > I'd suggest to use > 1. If you decide to keep ha_propagate, I would recommend > 0. The script would work even if for some unknown reasons there is only one node in the list. _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/