Hi Dejan, You take the action of checks on the place it should go, better! Thanks in advance!
Best regards, John >>> Dejan Muhamedagic <de...@suse.de> 2013-1-24 上午 0:17 >>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 08:21:34PM -0700, John Shi wrote: > Hi Dejan, > Is this patch OK ? I didn't see the pache going upstream yet. > Thanks! Applied now. Can you please also test the attached patch. It is fairly small and low impact, but still. Cheers, Dejan > Best regards, > John > > >>> Dejan Muhamedagic <de...@suse.de> 2012-12-24 下午 17:57 >>> > Hi John, > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:18:41PM -0700, John Shi wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Fix all cause an error to call rpc.statd, including: > > > > Specify the value of nfs_notify_cmd should be either sm-notify or rpc.statd > > in meta_data. > > Rename the parameter nfs_notify_retry_time to nfs_smnotify_retry_time, > > bacase no retrytime option for rpc.statd. > > The parameter nfs_notify_foreground can make the correct option for > > rpc.statd > > Looks good to me. > > Cheers, > > Dejan > > > Best regards, > > John > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > >
_______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
