On 2014-10-23T20:36:38, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenb...@linbit.com> wrote:
> If we want to require presence of start-stop-daemon,
> we could make all this somebody elses problem.
> I need find some time to browse through the code
> to see if it can be improved further.
> But in any case, using (a tool like) start-stop-daemon consistently
> throughout all RAs would improve the situation already.
>
> Do we want to do that?
> Dejan? David? Anyone?
I'm showing my age, but Linux FailSafe had such a tool as well. ;-) So
that might make sense.
Though in Linux nowadays, I wonder if one might not directly want to add
container support to the LRM, or directly use systemd. With a container,
all processes that the RA started would be easily tracked.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
