Hi Bernd,

Thanks for your continuing vigilance!

Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 20:11:51 Alan Robertson wrote:
>> This particular document had a couple of other errors too, which I
>> believe I've corrected.  See what you think.
> 
> 
> Thanks for improving the documentation, but I think the given xml example 
> does 
> not work as it is. Here's a similar fragment
> 
> 
> <op id="ntpd_monitor1" name="monitor" interval="0s">
>     <instance_attributes>
>         <attributes>
>             <nvpair id="probe" name="probe" value="1"/>
>         </attributes>
>     </instance_attributes>
> </op>
> 
> 
> Now crm_verify complains:
> 
> 
> crm_verify[12992]: 2007/04/10_16:16:39 WARN: assign_uuid: Updating object 
> from 
> <instance_attributes id=__empty__/> to <instance_attributes 
> id=6cd0933e-cc54-4ddb-8951-63259e41f3bd/>
> crm_verify[12992]: 2007/04/10_16:16:39 ERROR: do_id_check: Detected 
> <instance_attributes.../> object without an ID. Assigned: 
> 6cd0933e-cc54-4ddb-8951-63259e41f3bd
> crm_verify[12992]: 2007/04/10_16:16:39 ERROR: main: ID Check failed
> 
> 
> Setting <instance_attributes id="some_value"> will correct that.


Did I change that example in the document?  I only fixed the things I
noticed ;-).

Did you know you can fix this yourself?
        http://linux-ha.org/HowToUpdateWebsite

Obviously I can fix this myself, but we really need to get the community
more involved.  There just isn't enough of Andrew and Lars and Dejan and
me to do everything ourselves.

If you don't want to / can't fix it, let me know.  Otherwise, I'll leave
it as a learning experience for you ;-).

Thanks again for pointing this out!

-- 
    Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship...  Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to