On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 04:02:47PM +0200, Benjamin Watine wrote: > OK. I've lauched the IPv6addr again (standalone, and managed by HB), it > crashes, but no core dump seems to be generated today. No file from > today in core dir. I don't know why.
The core file might be in the directory where you ran it from. > The file command show me some old IPv6addr core dumps, you can find > backtraces of it in the tar.gz generated by your script. Thanks. Unfortunately, there is almost no debugging info. Most cores are from stonithd (I'll investigate that, but it's definitely in connection with the suicide agent), but there's also one from cib on fclose() call, though we don't see when it happened. > I join the "file root/*" output for you can find files easily. All these > core dumps are generated only by stonithd, IPv6addr, and pidof. You should probably report the pidof problem too, to your distro's bugzilla. > > Regards > > Ben > > Dejan Muhamedagic a écrit : > >On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:54:36AM +0200, Benjamin Watine wrote: > >>Dejan Muhamedagic a écrit : > >>>On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:59:12PM +0200, Benjamin Watine wrote: > >>>>Dejan Muhamedagic a écrit : > >>>>>On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:59:02AM +0200, Benjamin Watine wrote: > >>>>>>You were true, it wasn't a score problem, but my IPv6 resource that > >>>>>>causes an error, and let the resource group unstarted. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Without IPv6, all is OK, behaviour of Heartbeat fit my needs (start > >>>>>>on prefered node (castor), and failover after 3 fails). So, my > >>>>>>problem is IPv6 now. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>The script seems to have a problem : > >>>>>> > >>>>>># /etc/ha.d/resource.d/IPv6addr 2001:660:6301:301::47:1 start > >>>>>>*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (fast): > >>>>>>0x000000000050d340 *** > >>>>>>/etc/ha.d/resource.d//hto-mapfuncs: line 51: 4764 Aborted > >>>>>> $__SCRIPT_NAME start > >>>>>>2007/04/25_11:43:29 ERROR: Unknown error: 134 > >>>>>>ERROR: Unknown error: 134 > >>>>>> > >>>>>>but now, ifconfig show that IPv6 is well configured, but script exit > >>>>>>with error code. > >>>>>IPv6addr aborts, hence the exit code 134 (128+signo). Somebody > >>>>>recently posted a set of patches for IPv6addr... Right, I'm cc-ing > >>>>>this to Horms. > >>>>> > >>>>Thank you so much, I'm waiting for Horms so. I'll take a look to list > >>>>archive also. > >>>BTW, wasn't there also a core dump for this case too? Could you do > >>>a ls -R /var/lib/heartbeat/cores and check. > >>> > >>I don't know how to find core dump :/ In this case, should it be > >>core.22560 ? > > > >Some newer releases of file(1) show the program name which dumped > >the core: > > > >$ file core.6468 > >core.6468: ELF 32-bit LSB core file Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), > >SVR4-style, from 'gaim' > > > >Also, you can match the timestamps of core files and from the logs. > > > >># /etc/ha.d/resource.d/IPv6addr 2001:660:6301:301::47:1 start > >>*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (fast): > >>0x000000000050d340 *** > >>/etc/ha.d/resource.d//hto-mapfuncs: line 51: 22560 Aborted > >> $__SCRIPT_NAME start > >>2007/04/26_10:46:38 ERROR: Unknown error: 134 > >>ERROR: Unknown error: 134 > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ls -R /var/lib/heartbeat/cores > >>/var/lib/heartbeat/cores: > >>hacluster nobody root > >> > >>/var/lib/heartbeat/cores/hacluster: > >>core.3620 core.4116 core.4119 core.4123 core.5262 core.5265 > >>core.5269 core.5272 > >>core.3626 core.4117 core.4121 core.4124 core.5263 core.5266 > >>core.5270 > >>core.3829 core.4118 core.4122 core.5256 core.5264 core.5268 > >>core.5271 > >> > >>/var/lib/heartbeat/cores/nobody: > >> > >>/var/lib/heartbeat/cores/root: > >>core.10766 core.21816 core.29951 core.3642 core.3650 core.3658 > >>core.3667 core.4471 > >>core.11379 core.23505 core.30813 core.3643 core.3651 core.3661 > >>core.3668 core.4550 > >>core.11592 core.24403 core.31033 core.3645 core.3652 core.3663 > >>core.4234 core.5104 > >>core.12928 core.24863 core.3489 core.3647 core.3653 core.3664 > >>core.4371 core.5761 > >>core.15849 core.25786 core.3591 core.3648 core.3654 core.3665 > >>core.4394 core.6130 > >>core.21501 core.28286 core.3610 core.3649 core.3657 core.3666 > >>core.4470 > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Well, you have quite a few. Let's hope that they stem from only > >those two errors. > > > >I'll attach a script which should generate all backtraces from your > >core files. It's been lightly tested but should work. > > > >>>>>># ifconfig > >>>>>>eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:13:72:58:74:5F > >>>>>> inet adr:193.48.169.46 Bcast:193.48.169.63 > >>>>>>Masque:255.255.255.224 > >>>>>> adr inet6: 2001:660:6301:301:213:72ff:fe58:745f/64 > >>>>>> Scope:Global > >>>>>> adr inet6: fe80::213:72ff:fe58:745f/64 Scope:Lien > >>>>>> adr inet6: 2001:660:6301:301::47:1/64 Scope:Global > >>>>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > >>>>>> RX packets:3788 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > >>>>>> TX packets:3992 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > >>>>>> collisions:0 lg file transmission:1000 > >>>>>> RX bytes:450820 (440.2 KiB) TX bytes:844188 (824.4 KiB) > >>>>>> Adresse de base:0xecc0 Mémoire:fe6e0000-fe700000 > >>>>>> > >>>>>>And if I launch the script again, no error is returned : > >>>>>> > >>>>>># /etc/ha.d/resource.d/IPv6addr 2001:660:6301:301::47:1 start > >>>>>>2007/04/25_11:45:23 INFO: Success > >>>>>>INFO: Success > >>>So, you're saying that once the resource is running, starting it > >>>again doesn't produce an error? Did you also try to stop it and > >>>start it from the stopped state? > >>> > >>Yes, but probably because the script just check that IPv6 is set, and so > >>don't try to set it again. If I stop and start again, the error occurs. > >> > >>>>>>For others errors, I disable stonith for the moment, and DRBD is > >>>>>>built in kernel, so the drbd module is not needed. I've seen this > >>>>>>message, but it's not a problem. > >>>>>There's a small problem with the stonith suicide agent, which > >>>>>renders it unusable, but it is soon to be fixed. > >>>>> > >>>>OK, that's what I had read on this list, but I wasn't sure. Is there is > >>>>any patch now ? > >>>> > >>>>>>I joined log and config, and core file about stonith > >>>>>>(/var/lib/heartbeat/cores/root/core.3668). Is it what you asked for > >>>>>>(backtrace from stonith core dump) ? > >>>>>You shouldn't be sending core dumps to a public list: it may > >>>>>contain sensitive information. What I asked for, a backtrace, you > >>>>>get like this: > >>>>> > >>>>>$ gdb /usr/lib64/heartbeat/stonithd core.3668 > >>>>>(gdb) bt > >>>>>... < here comes the backtrace > >>>>>(gdb) quit > >>>>> > >>>>Ooops ! Here it is : > >>>> > >>>>#0 0x00000039b9d03507 in stonith_free_hostlist () from > >>>>/usr/lib64/libstonith.so.1 > >>>>#1 0x0000000000408a95 in ?? () > >>>>#2 0x0000000000407fee in ?? () > >>>>#3 0x00000000004073c3 in ?? () > >>>>#4 0x000000000040539d in ?? () > >>>>#5 0x0000000000405015 in ?? () > >>>>#6 0x00000039b950abd4 in G_CH_dispatch_int () from > >>>>/usr/lib64/libplumb.so.1 > >>>>#7 0x0000003a12a266bd in g_main_context_dispatch () from > >>>>/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 > >>>>#8 0x0000003a12a28397 in g_main_context_acquire () from > >>>>/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 > >>>>#9 0x0000003a12a28735 in g_main_loop_run () from > >>>>/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 > >>>>#10 0x000000000040341a in ?? () > >>>>#11 0x0000003a0fd1c4ca in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 > >>>>#12 0x000000000040303a in ?? () > >>>>#13 0x00007fff0f04b8d8 in ?? () > >>>>#14 0x000000000000001c in ?? () > >>>>#15 0x0000000000000001 in ?? () > >>>>#16 0x00007fff0f04cb73 in ?? () > >>>>#17 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () > >>>> > >>>>Thanks for taking time to explain me some basics... > >>>You're welcome. As Andrew suggested, you should file bugs for both > >>>of these. Interestingly, all those question marks mean that some > >>>debugging info is missing, but then there is some in libplumb.so. > >>>Odd. Where did you say your heartbeat package comes from? > >>> > >>heartbeat-2.0.8-2.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm > >>heartbeat-gui-2.0.8-2.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm > >>heartbeat-pils-2.0.8-2.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm > >>heartbeat-stonith-2.0.8-2.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm > >> > >>From here IIRC : > >>http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/x86_64/RPMS/ > >> > >> > >>>>Ben > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Thanks. > >>>>> > >>>>>>Thanks a lot for helping. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Ben > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Dejan Muhamedagic a écrit : > >>>>>>>On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 06:36:04PM +0200, Benjamin Watine wrote: > >>>>>>>>Thank you, Dejan, for replying (I feel less alone now !) > >>>>>>>That's good. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>I've applied location constraint to only one resource (slapd) as > >>>>>>>>you suggest me, but it still doesn't work as expected. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>I've read in the list archive that I have to sum all resources > >>>>>>>>stickiness of the group to get the real calculated resource > >>>>>>>>stickiness. It makes sense, let's do it : > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>resource-stickiness at 100, > >>>>>>>>resource-failure-stickiness at -400 > >>>>>>>>score on slapd on node1 (castor) at 1600 > >>>>>>>>score on slapd on node2 (pollux) at 1000 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>If I apply given relation (I have 6 resources in my group): > >>>>>>>>((1600 - 1000) + (6 * 100))) / 400 = 3 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>slapd should start on castor, and failback to pollux if it fails 3 > >>>>>>>>times, right ? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>But now my resource doesn't start at all. In the log, I can see : > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Apr 24 18:00:26 pollux pengine: [4145]: WARN: native_color: > >>>>>>>>Resource ldap_drbddisk cannot run anywhere > >>>>>>>>Apr 24 18:00:26 pollux pengine: [4145]: WARN: native_color: > >>>>>>>>Resource ldap_Filesystem cannot run anywhere > >>>>>>>>Apr 24 18:00:26 pollux pengine: [4145]: WARN: native_color: > >>>>>>>>Resource ldap_IPaddr_193_48_169_47 cannot run anywhere > >>>>>>>>Apr 24 18:00:26 pollux pengine: [4145]: WARN: native_color: > >>>>>>>>Resource IPv6addr_ldap cannot run anywhere > >>>>>>>>Apr 24 18:00:26 pollux pengine: [4145]: WARN: native_color: > >>>>>>>>Resource ldap_slapd cannot run anywhere > >>>>>>>>Apr 24 18:00:26 pollux pengine: [4145]: WARN: native_color: > >>>>>>>>Resource ldap_MailTo cannot run anywhere > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>What does I do wrong ?? Is there an exhaustive documentation about > >>>>>>>>scores and location ? It's complex to do, but what I want is really > >>>>>>>>simple and common : "start on this node first and failover on other > >>>>>>>>node if you fail 3 times". > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Log and config attached. > >>>>>>>Log is OK. Several things in there: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Apr 24 17:54:53 pollux tengine: [4168]: ERROR: > >>>>>>>stonithd_op_result_ready: failed due to not on signon status. > >>>>>>>Apr 24 17:54:53 pollux tengine: [4168]: ERROR: > >>>>>>>tengine_stonith_connection_destroy: Fencing daemon has left us > >>>>>>>Apr 24 17:54:53 pollux heartbeat: [3574]: ERROR: Exiting > >>>>>>>/usr/lib64/heartbeat/stonithd process 3668 dumped core > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Perhaps you could give us a backtrace from this core dump. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Apr 24 17:56:08 pollux drbd: ERROR: Module drbd does not exist in > >>>>>>>/proc/modules > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>A drbd setup problem? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Apr 24 17:54:53 pollux pengine: [4169]: ERROR: can_run_resources: No > >>>>>>>node supplied > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>This is an interesting message. Can't find it in the development > >>>>>>>code. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Apr 24 18:00:26 pollux IPv6addr: [4365]: ERROR: no valid mecahnisms > >>>>>>>Apr 24 18:00:26 pollux crmd: [3647]: ERROR: process_lrm_event: LRM > >>>>>>>operation IPv6addr_ldap_start_0 (call=22, rc=1) Error unknown error > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Can I suggest to first have a regular working configuration which > >>>>>>>includes all the resources and a sane and well behaving cluster? > >>>>>>>Then we see if fiddling with constraints gives any results. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Thanks. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Thanks ! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Ben > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Dejan Muhamedagic a écrit : > >>>>>>>>>On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 03:04:56PM +0200, Benjamin Watine wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>Hi the list > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>I'm trying to set location constraint for 2 resources group, but > >>>>>>>>>>I don't understand very well how it works. > >>>>>>>>>>I want to define a prefered node for each group, and tell > >>>>>>>>>>HeartBeat to move the group on the other node if 3 resources fail > >>>>>>>>>>(and restart) occurs. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>So, I defined default-resource-stickiness at 100, > >>>>>>>>>>default-resource-failure-stickiness at -100, and put a score of > >>>>>>>>>>1200 on prefered node, and 1000 for "second" node. > >>>>>>>>>>((1200-1000+100)/100 = 3). > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>I'm trying to do this for 2 group. If 3 fails occurs for the > >>>>>>>>>>resource of a group, all the group have to be moved to the other > >>>>>>>>>>node. Can I configure group location constraint as for resource ? > >>>>>>>>>>How can I get group failcount (if it make sense) ? > >>>>>>>>>I doubt that you can. The failcounts are only on a per primitive > >>>>>>>>>basis. Groups are just shorthand for order and colocation > >>>>>>>>>constraints. However, if you choose a resource which matters the > >>>>>>>>>most to you (ldap/web service) and make location constraints on > >>>>>>>>>them, the other resources in the group will follow should it move > >>>>>>>>>to another node. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>... and nothing works :p The resource group don't start on the > >>>>>>>>>>good node, and never failover if I manually stop 3 times a > >>>>>>>>>>resource of the group. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>Some light about this location constraints would be greatly > >>>>>>>>>>appreciated ! > >>>>>>>>>I'm afraid that I can't offer help on calculating the scores. There > >>>>>>>>>has been, however, extensive discussion on the list on the matter > >>>>>>>>>several months or a year ago. Perhaps you could search this list's > >>>>>>>>>archives. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>cibadmin -Ql attached. > >>>>>>>>>I can only see in the status that the failcount for httpd_web is 5. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>Please include the logs, etc, see: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>Thank you, in advance. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>Ben > >>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>Linux-HA mailing list > >>>>Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > >>>>http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > >>>>See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Linux-HA mailing list > >>Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > >>http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > >>See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Linux-HA mailing list > >Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > >http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > >See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > /var/lib/heartbeat/cores# file root/* > root/core.10917: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.11711: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.12305: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.12407: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'IPv6addr' > root/core.13407: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'pidof' > root/core.14899: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.17390: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'pidof' > root/core.18875: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'pidof' > root/core.19244: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'pidof' > root/core.20147: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.20441: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'IPv6addr' > root/core.21125: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'IPv6addr' > root/core.22022: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.24140: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'pidof' > root/core.24525: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.25783: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'IPv6addr' > root/core.26996: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'pidof' > root/core.29184: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'pidof' > root/core.31357: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'IPv6addr' > root/core.3898: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.3938: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.3957: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.3961: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.3963: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.3964: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.3966: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.3967: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.3968: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.3969: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.3974: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.3976: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.3977: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.3988: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.4002: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.4053: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.4256: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'IPv6addr' > root/core.4259: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'IPv6addr' > root/core.4290: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.4310: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'IPv6addr' > root/core.4355: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'IPv6addr' > root/core.4362: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'IPv6addr' > root/core.4363: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'IPv6addr' > root/core.4368: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'IPv6addr' > root/core.4639: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'pidof' > root/core.490: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'pidof' > root/core.4990: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'pidof' > root/core.574: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.6148: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.7763: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'pidof' > root/core.8308: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'stonithd' > root/core.979: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'IPv6addr' > root/core.983: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > SVR4-style, from 'IPv6addr' > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems -- Dejan _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems