Hi Horms,
Thanks for the update, but when we try this version:
http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/linux/ldirectord/download/ldirectord.
2007-05-01.e022c4b33b0e
we get:
TCP 192.168.0.5:87 wrr
-> 10.10.11.87:87 Masq 0 0 0
TCP 10.10.11.89:87 wrr
-> 10.10.11.87:87 Route 8 0 0
which means that the rules is setup correctly, but the weight on the
masq service is 0?
If we try to use another port number the weight is correct. Strange?
Regards
Kristoffer
On 03/05/2007, at 3.20, Simon Horman wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:49:53AM +0200, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote:
Hi list,
We have a problem tested with ldirectord 1.42 and 1.143 and
ipvsadm version
v1.24 2003/06/07 on debian etch.
The problem is when a real server is used in the same ldirectord
configuration
file with a masq VIP and a gate VIP.
Like this:
#Masq VIP
virtual=192.168.0.5:87
real=10.10.11.87:87 masq 8
protocol=tcp
checktype=on
#Gate VIP
virtual=10.10.11.89:87
real=10.10.11.87:87 gate 8
protocol=tcp
checktype=on
Result is:
TCP 192.168.0.5:87 wrr
-> 10.10.11.87:87 Masq 8 0 0
TCP 10.10.11.89:87 wrr
-> 10.10.11.87:87 Masq 8 0 0
As you see both services are masqueraded.
Can anybody shed some light on this issue?
Hi,
that is a fairly ancient version of ldirectord. I seem to recall
bugs of the nature that you describe poping up in the past
and being resolved. Is there any chance that you could try
a newer version of ldirectord? I have put the latest version up at
http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/linux/ldirectord/download/ldirectord.
2007-05-01.e022c4b33b0e
More information about how to get new versions of ldirecotrd
can be found at
http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/linux/ldirectord/download.shtml
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
