Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On 5/31/07, Jan Kalcic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> > On 5/31/07, Jan Kalcic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> > On 5/31/07, Jan Kalcic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> >> > please update to the latest version available from suse via the >> >> update >> >> >> > service >> >> >> > >> >> >> On SLES 10 updated I don't have the problem mentioned here but I >> >> can't >> >> >> generate a cib.xml which works correctly for me. The cib.xml >> >> generated >> >> >> from the same haresources file by a guy here looks much >> different and >> >> >> works properly. >> >> > >> >> > from the same version? >> >> > >> >> > define "doesnt work"? >> >> > >> >> >> >> His version was 2.0.8. Mine was 2.0.7-1.2. No idea about his OS but I >> > >> > different versions produced different output? gee, i'm shocked. >> > >> >> Maybe you forgot what the topic is. > > No, I've not forgotten. > > But you're wasting my time and that annoy me. > > I don't have all day to pry relevant information out of people. > "it works for him but not me", yet you didn't think to mention the > version difference? > > Thats pretty relevant don't you think? Especially since it means the > problem, whatever it was, is clearly already resolved and all you need > to do is upgrade (or follow Dejan's advice at the time which was > almost certainly correct). > Don't keep on pushing this. I told you which is the version. Do you think I have time to waste? You wrong man. I've just said to Tom, the guys who opened the thread, that even if I updated my sles10 it didn't work for me.
Dejan's advice was "stop heartbeat before modify cib.xml" and it was a very important advice (thanks Dejan once again) but the cib.xml which eventually worked was the one he passed me because, once again, the one I generated with version 2.0.7 didn't work for me. Are you saying it doesn't work properly? Then, you should know that this is the latest version available from suse. Andrew Beekhof wrote: > please update to the latest version available from suse via the update > service Once again, it doesn't solve the problem! > If you want vendor support for older versions then you need to go via > the proper channels, and community mailing lists ain't one of them. Don't say update to the latest version available from suse then. > > The lesson people, is that you're not going to get a response if you > don't give enough information on which to do so. And there is no > excuse for not knowing what to send because its at the bottom of every > single email sent to the list: > Ohhh, very interesting lesson. > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > >> We are not talking about the output >> produced between different versions which is quite obvious it is >> different. Here the problem is that the haresources2cib.py provided with >> SLES10, and with its updates too, doesn't generate a correct cib.xml. >> Unfortunately I don't longer have the environment to reproduce the >> problem to give you more information. When I had I did but at that time >> you were not interested in perhaps. >> >> >> don't think it matters. The topic started here: >> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/pipermail/linux-ha/2007-April/024894.html >> >> >> >> I can't tell you that the cib.xml file I generated was shorter >> compared >> >> to the one which worked. Some lines were missing but not being an >> expert >> >> at all I can't tell you exactly where was the problem. Actually I've >> >> given up for a while with crm and at the moment I'm using old >> fashioned >> >> haresources file which is much easier for new heartbeat-guys like >> me and >> >> enough powerful for simple scenarios. >> >> >> >> Hope this help. >> > >> > i'm not sure how since you've still not described _anywhere_ what >> > "doesn't work" means. you've also provided no logs. did you try >> > crm_verify at all? >> As above, I could but now I can't give you more information. >> >> Jan >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
