On 7/4/07, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just as an FYI, for anyone else who is interested... I found using the Fedora packages available here (v 2.1.0), http://software.opensuse.org/download/server:/ha-clustering/ to be problematic getting them installed on RHEL 4. The reason being that they have dependencies that are not easily resolved under RHEL 4.
more information? i based the dependancies on the ones used by RH to build their heartbeat packages but I'm all ears if you think i've made a mistake...
Instead, I had more success using the Centos packages here (v 2.0.8): http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/x86_64/RPMS/ The rpm install order went like this: heartbeat-pils libidn curl heartbeat-stonith lm_sensors heartbeat This leaves me with a 2.0.8 installation, which might be okay, however, I'm under the impression that using the later 2.1.0 version would be more stable(?) To other HB users feel that 2.1.0 is more stable???
don't use 2.0.8 if you have any choice in the matter please read the various emails on the subject
Also, is the source for 2.1.0 available? I was only able to find the source for 2.0.8 on the HA website.
as has been explained many times here on the list, the sources for any version are available from: http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/archive/<version>.tar.bz2 eg. http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/archive/STABLE-2.1.0.tar.bz2 _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
