> v1-style only exposes the attributes which were present in v1 before, I > think. The lack of flexibility in the legacy v1-scripts is one of the > reasons why we're using OCF now ... The wrappers are a > legacy-compatibility thingy.
Well, in v1 it "just worked" using loopback aliases to bind services on vips. This behavior should be default in the legacy compatibility wrapper thingy. I'm not so happy about this change. > > Well, cut is faster. But yes, it should be consolidated and standarized. Well really? ;) But does it matter? On which machines does this code run? Pentium 1? ;) I think on every machine, which is able to run the operating system required by this heartbeat version, it will not make a difference if cut or awk is used. Cheers, -Michael _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
