Robert Wipfel a e'crit:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 9:51 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:37:37PM +0200, FG wrote:
Hi all,
[...]
Yes, you should use STONITH.
Or perhaps somebody knows that a SAN DS4000 can
give access to the
logical drive for the second server and block the
access to the first one ?
It is probably possible in case you have a fc switch, but
heartbeat doesn't support dynamic fc reconfiguration.
indeed, we use fc switch and i'm going to investigate this.
Like a stonith structure, i can imagine the same operation... The backup
server must be able to discuss with the fc switch and disconnect the two
fc of the first server before to mount the filesystem on the second.
www.eclipse.org/aperi does, for the DS4000 too....
i will see that too...
If someone have experience with heartbeat and IBM
SAN in an
active/passive configuration, i'm interested...
Hth,
Robert
Thanks for your answers.
Fabrice
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
