Quoting Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 7/19/07, FG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have two servers with each one two HBA cards (FC) attached to a SAN
IBM DS4000 where we store the mailbox.
These 2 servers are in Active/Passive configuration with heartbeat and
use stonith to ensure no data corruption.
I just want to know which interest i have to use crm configuration
rather than haresources file for my configuration, only two nodes ?
haresources is generally simpler to get started with
however it is less flexible and isn't receiving much attention from
developers these days
there are also conversion scripts to convert a haresources
configuration to a crm one... so you can start with one and migrate to
the other
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Thanks,
finally, i choose crm because like you say, more flexible and more
powerful to handle score and to understand the functionalities.
We are in test phase with RHEL5 and heartbeat 2.1.1 (install from
tar.gz) in spite of the Alan's announce.
All failure's test are ok except stonith, we don't have to test yet.
W'll see after holidays (end of august). And maybe, a new release will
be available.
I would like to congratulate all the team for your admirable work.
Best regards.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
