On 8/8/07, Ciro Iriarte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/8/8, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 8/8/07, Ciro Iriarte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2007/8/8, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On 8/8/07, Ciro Iriarte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > /etc/init.d/apache2 > > > > > > > > generally less flexible (cant pass parameters) > > > > > > What kind of parameter would i need starting apache with the stock > > > script?, it already knows where are the config files. > > > > If you had multiple instances > > But it was a general statement regarding LSB scripts - not specific to > > apache > > > > > > also, depending on your system it may not be truly LSB compliant (and > > > > thus cant be used with heartbeat) > > > > > > It's stock apache2 from SLES9SP3, as far as i know, SUSE people try > > > their best to follow LSB > > > > In recent times, Debian seems to be the worst for this (based on > > people reporting problems). > > Haven't played with debian in a while :D > > > SUSE is generally ok. I dont have much experience with other distros. > > So, basically, in my specific case, not running more than one > instance, with a pretty much static configuration and a decent lsb > script, would be fine to use it instead of the OCF one?
yeah. should be fine. though i dont know how the status commands compare. > PS: Offtopic, given the package at BuildService didn't move from > 2.1.0, means that it's still safe to use them? Nod. I'll be refreshing them in the next day or so. I'd have done so last week but a number of important bugs came to my attention and I wanted to fix them first. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
