On 8/16/07, James Oakley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 16 August 2007 3:33 pm, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > > Aug 14 11:44:10 redun2 lrmd: [28337]: info: RA output: > > > (cups:start:stderr) cupsd: Child exited with status 1! > > > > Actually, it seems like this message is misleading: what lrmd > > reported is the output caught on stderr which is apparently > > coming from cupsd. That doesn't mean that the RA exited with code 1. > > Perhaps you could run the RA by hand and verify the exit code. > > That message is from SUSE's startproc command. It was cupsd that exited with a > status of 1. startproc pointed this out, since it checks for start failures > and correctly returned 7.
i dont believe that in this particular case 7 is correct. at least its not what you want the node to be fenced as a result. 7 means "the resource is safely stopped" use one of: * EXECRA_UNKNOWN_ERROR = 1, * EXECRA_INVALID_PARAM = 2, * EXECRA_UNIMPLEMENT_FEATURE = 3, * EXECRA_INSUFFICIENT_PRIV = 4, if you want the node shot. in the mean-time, i have uploaded some new packages which fix the related bug. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
