matilda matilda wrote:
first to your question: I'm pretty sure you can't configure that. My question or better interest is: For what do you need that?
I guessed that :) I'm also hoping that there's a relatively easy way we could implement support for such a feature that might be useful to the community.
The group primarily for handling the group as one entity, ordered or unordered. Their will be never a "at the same time" anyway. So, if your RA is called with "a,b,c" what does it do with that? Does the RA control the sequence? Start/Stop it at the same time, which will never happen?
We currently implement the desired behaviour by having a list just like that and a single resource. The single resource starts multiple sub-resources. But this prevents us from adding/removing sub-resources effectively as HB knows nothing of them.
I'm really interested in that use case. It's morning here and I can only imagine that you want to dynamically order the way the parts are handled.
Each resource within the group needs a number of sub-resources started/stopped and the sequence is mixed up between the resources when starting/stopping everything together.
Hope this explains it! -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering Manager: AppMan + HA Phone: +61-3-9963-1957 SGI Australian Software Group Mobile: +61-4-1360-4720 ------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
