On 2007-10-16T12:11:24, Ian Jiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to use the hearbeat idea in an embedded environment. The
> current Linux heartbeat is too complicated, because an embedded
> system differs a lot with a general Linux cluster, and is
> usually much simpler and less of variability. So I am wondering
> whether there is other high available system using the heartbeat
> idea with simple architecture and is applicable for me as a
> reference. Open sources is better. Any suggestion is
> appreciated!
You mean, whether there are other HA solutions? Of course.
There keepalived, the RedHat Cluster Suite, some implementations of the
Service-Availability-Forum specifications ... Google will tell you more
about them ;-)
But even Linux HA isn't too complicated for embedded systems; just
because the flexibility is there doesn't mean you've got to use it. You
could deploy a standarized configuration just the same.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
