On 2007-12-14T14:54:38, Keisuke MORI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IPaddr RA has two kinds of parameter to specify the netmask: > "netmask" and "cidr_netmask". > > Which one is "officially supported" and recommended to use?
The fact that only the cidr_netmask is in the metadata is a pretty big clue. ;-) > >From the mail archive below, I thought that cidr_netmask was wrong, > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/36035#36035 Yeah, well, it was probably well intended though not well thought out; and now we're stuck with it, and the RA will continue to support both names forever. > As long as I tried both works the same; both can take either > CIDR form (e.g. 24) or the dot-notation (255.255.255.0), > but I want to always use the official one. Exactly. Simply accepting both forms is easy. Regards, Lars -- Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
