Afternoon All, 

If this is the case than we probably need to do a check for libxml2 and
for bzip when running the configure command and flag it if they aren't
there.

Its possible its there (I don't have the code checked out at the
moment).

Matt

On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 12:22 -0400, Eric J. Bowser wrote:

> Eric J. Bowser wrote:
> > Compiling xml.c:                                                      
> > [ERROR]
> >   gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../include 
> > -I../../../include -I../../../include -I../../../include 
> > -I../../../libltdl -I../../../libltdl -I../../../linux-ha 
> > -I../../../linux-ha -I../../.. -I../../.. -D_BSD_SOURCE -D__BSD_SOURCE 
> > -D__FAVOR_BSD -DHAVE_NET_ETHERNET_H -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
> > -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -g -O2 -Wall 
> > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wstrict-prototypes 
> > -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings 
> > -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wbad-function-cast -Winline 
> > -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat=2 -Wformat-security 
> > -Wformat-nonliteral -Wno-long-long -Wno-strict-aliasing -Werror -ggdb3 
> > -funsigned-char -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations 
> > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement -cc1: warnings being 
> > treated as errors
> >   xml.c: In function 'write_xml_file':
> >   xml.c:618: warning: unused variable 'in'
> >   xml.c: In function 'get_message_xml':
> >   xml.c:758: error: 'BZ_OK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> >   xml.c:758: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> >   xml.c:758: error: for each function it appears in.)
> >   xml.c:779: warning: implicit declaration of function 
> > 'BZ2_bzBuffToBuffDecompress'
> >   xml.c:782: error: 'BZ_OUTBUFF_FULL' undeclared (first use in this 
> > function)
> > gmake[3]: *** [xml.lo] Error 1
> > gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> 
> Actually, on a guess, installing the bzip2 development package got me past 
> this.
> 
> ~Eric
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to