> Just going through the rest of my "vacation email"...
> 
> This is the same issue you filed bug 1859 for right?

Yes.
As you mentioned in bug 1859, hb_report(work well) has some troubles.

Thank,
Junko

> 
> On Mar 17, 2008, at 9:14 AM, Junko IKEDA wrote:
> 
> >> It's broken in 2.1.3. It was fixed in Pacemaker 0.6 though.
> >
> > I run Pacemaker 0.6.2-11.1, but something is wrong with it.
> > My configuration is allowed to fail up to four times,
> > and the resource would move to the stand-by node at 5th failure.
> > It basically goes well, but it would run fail-over action at 3rd
> > failure
> > sometime.
> >
> > attached:
> > hb_report.tar.gz (work well)
> > hb_report_error.tar.gz (bad case)
> >
> > node-b's "pe-input-9" in hb_report_error.tar.gz is strange.
> > Pengine considers the resource status as "stopped", and calculate
> > its score
> > as default status.
> > It loses the recorded score.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Junko
> >
> >
> >> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Jose Chavez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I've had using the command 'crm_failcount'. I guess that parameter
> >>> have
> > to
> >> be increasing every time the resources has a failure, but it doesn't
> > happen.
> >>>
> >>> The first time the resource (ntp for the example) is stopped, the
> > parameter
> >> fail-count is increased 0->1
> >>>
> >>> Sometimes the second time the resource is stopped the parameter
> >>> moves
> > 1->2,
> >> and sometimes doesn't change.
> >>>
> >>> The next failures (3th, 4th, 5th, ......) never change the
> > 'fail-count'.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Is this the right behaviour?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _________________________________________________________________
> >>> Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your
> > Hotmail(R)-get
> >> your "fix".
> >>>
> >>
> http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx__________________________________
> >> _____________
> >>> Linux-HA mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> >>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Serge Dubrouski.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Linux-HA mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> > <
> > hb_report
> > .tar
> > .gz
> > >
> > <
> > hb_report_error.tar.gz>_______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to