On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 04:52, NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I trying newer version of lha-2.1(changeset: 12148:e902ad7642fd)
> and notice that rsc_order constraints behavior between Clone Set
> and non-clone(active-standby) Resource Group may be changed.
>
> In my test environment(2-node active-standby cluster),
> I setting rsc_order constraints below.
>
>  <rsc_order id="order_resource1_clone1" from="clone1"
>  action="start" type="before" to="non_clone_group1"/>
>
> If clone1(Clone Set ID) resource monitor failed, then
> all clone1 resources stopped.
>
> And non_clone_group1(Resource Group ID) resources do-noting.
> It is OK.
>
> But I recovery clone1 resource failure and clear resource status
> and reset fail-count(using crm_resource -C and crm_failcount -D),
> then clone1 resources started and all non_clone_group1 resources
> restarted.
>
> In Heartbeat 2.1.3, non_clone_group1 resoureces are not restarted
> in the same situation.

Thats a bug in 2.1.3
The mandatory part of the ordering constraint was being ignored.

If you don't want non_clone_group1 to be restarted when this happens,
make the ordering constraint advisory-only by setting adding score="0"
to the constraint.

>
> And to make matters worse, if clone1 and non_clone_group1 has
> rsc_colocation constraints, then non_clone_gropu1 resoureces
> restart brew up automatic failback.

You lost me... can you rephrase?

> Is it expected behavior? or my configuration has some mistakes?
>
> Best Regards,
> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------
> NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
> NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION
> Open Source Business Unit
> Software Services Integration Business Division
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to