can you repost your current configuration?
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 14:01, Itay Donenhirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: "Andrew Beekhof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:43, Itay Donenhirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> First of all, thanks for the speedy reply. >>> >>>> From: "Andrew Beekhof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 15:21, Itay Donenhirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> > Hi all, >>>> > I have a weird problem: >>>> > >>>> > There are 4 nodes: ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4 >>>> > There are 3 resource groups: Gha1 Gha2 Gha3 >>>> > The cluster is symmetric. >>>> > Upon startup - Gha1 lives on ha2, Gha2 lives on ha3 and Gha3 lives on >>>> > ha4. >>>> > >>>> > I do a 'service heartbeat stop' on ha3. I expected to see Gha2 migrate >>>> > from >>>> > ha3 to ha1 but instead I get that Gha2 migrates to ha2 and Gha1 migrates >>>> > to >>>> > ha1. Why is that? >>>> >>>> Because you didnt tell it you cared. >>> >>> I don't think you understood me correctly, maybe I didn't make myself >>> clear enough, sorry. >>> I don't want the resources to fail in a specific order, just in such a >>> way that will not make non-failed resources switch nodes. >>> I don't care which node gets the failed resource as long as it will be >>> done in the minimal number of fail-overs. >>> It seems to me that it should have worked using symmetric cluster and >>> no location constraints at all. >> >> default-resource-stickiness >> > > I'm sorry but I don't get it. My default-resource-stickiness is > INFINITY. If I understand correctly it says how much the resource > "wants" to stay where it is upon fail-back. Here my problem is that a > few resources change nodes. What am I missing? > > In the document you refereed me to there is exactly one line about > default-resource-stickiness: "How much do resources prefer to stay > where they are? Used when... ". In my case "where they are" is not > relevant because they all move to places they never been to... > > But don't I seem to understand? > > Thanks > Itay > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
