On Thursday 04 September 2008 21:12:31 Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Sep 4, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Paul Walsh wrote: > > Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > >> Well, heartbeat doesn't require pacemaker. Pacemaker doesn't require > >> heartbeat (it can also run on openAIS). But yes, they can cooperate. > > > > I take it that's because Heartbeat can still use a "v1" style > > configuration (though the terms "v1" and "v2" may add to > > the confusion - people tend to want to use the "latest/newest" > > version so perhaps see "v1" as inferior)? > > It _is_ inferior. > Its easier to configure because it doesn't do even half what v2 can. > > V1 lets you define groups that run here or there... of course the > configuration can be mastered in a nanosecond. > > > Maybe "simple configuration" for non-crm clusters and "advanced > > configuration" for those with a CRM (Pacemaker or > > otherwise)? OK, so "simple" may be a bit lightweight, but using an > > haresources file is a lot easier than getting to > > grips with the XML! :) > > Its not _that_ hard. 90% of it is cut&paste and changing a few values. > You'd think we were requiring people to learn Latin or something. > > But we've been making the XML easier to read anyway and Dejan has just > completed an awesome CLI tool (totally devoid of XML) for 1.0 that > makes configuring the cluster a walk in the park. This is sorely needed. Weeks later, I still have no working version 2 configuration to replace this one-liner:
ubu drbddisk::r0 vgchange::vg0 isnsd iscsi-target IPaddr::10.3.7.10/24/eth0 &:-) Disclaimer: I have not drunk the xml kool ade. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
