> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-ha- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Beekhof > Sent: Monday, 3 November 2008 6:30 PM > To: General Linux-HA mailing list > Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] crm_mon - ha 2.99.1,pacemaker 1.0 - not showing > unmanaged status > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 03:06, Alex Strachan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Prior releases to HA 2.99.1, pacemaker 1.0 monitoring command crm_mon > showed > > a resource which was currently unmanaged visibly. > > > > > > > > e.g. > > > > Resource Group: group_itsapaims1 > > > > resource_itsapaims1_drbd (heartbeat:itsapaims1_drbddisk): > > Started canopus (unmanaged) > > > > resource_itsapaims1_fs (heartbeat::ocf:itsapaims1_Filesystem): > > Started canopus (unmanaged) > > > > resource_itsapaims1_vip (heartbeat::ocf:IPaddr): Started > > canopus (unmanaged) > > > > resource_itsapaims1_oracle (heartbeat::ocf:itsapaims1_oracle): > > Started canopus (unmanaged) > > > > resource_itsapaims1_oralsnr (heartbeat::ocf:itsapaims1_oralsnr): > > Started canopus (unmanaged) > > > > resource_itsapaims1_aims (lsb:itsapaims1_aims): Started canopus > > (unmanaged) > > > > resource_itsapaims1_apache (heartbeat::ocf:itsapaims1_apache): > > Started canopus (unmanaged) > > > > resource_itsapaims1_smb (lsb:itsapaims1_smb): Started canopus > > (unmanaged) > > > > > > > > but now using the latest software it is not highlighted. > > > > > > > > I found this a very useful feature, can it please be considered to be > put > > back into the codebase. > > Thats odd - it wasn't deliberately removed and the code still looks > correct: > > is_set(rsc->flags, pe_rsc_managed)?"":" > (unmanaged)", > > Can you send me the cibadmin -Ql output from the cluster when you see > this behavior pls?
The issue was I was using crm_resource -p is_managed instead of is-managed in a similar manner to Allan. For a while there my cib had both entries under instance attributes is_managed, and is-managed. I cleaned up the is_managed and the status is now being shown correctly when using crm_mon. When using the unmanaged/managed functionality the latest software does not seem as reliable. It seems to provoke a reaction from HA simply by setting all resources to unmanaged/managed. I will raise this as separate issue. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
