On 2008-11-10T19:16:06, Junko IKEDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I may sound like I'm repeating myself, but our customer plans to take
> Heartbeat 2.1.4 soon,
> so I have to ask it again.
These customers really should go with pacemaker 1.0.x + heartbeat
2.99.x. Those should be a "drop-in" replacement for 2.1.4.
> Do you believe that the above two patches have efficacy as recovering split
> brain of joining some additional nodes?
> If so, it might be a good promotional point to recommend Pacemaker to the
> customer.
Yes, it is quite likely this is better handled in the more recent
releases.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
